As well as making money, businesses
also have social responsibilities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Businesses
have always sought to make a profit, but it is becoming increasingly common to
hear people talk about the social obligations that companies have. I completely
agree with the idea that businesses should do more for society than simply make
money.
On
the one hand, I accept that businesses must make money in order to survive in a
competitive world. It seems logical that the priority of any company should be
to cover its running costs, such as employees’ wages and payments for buildings
and utilities. On top of these costs, companies also need to invest in
improvements and innovations if they wish to remain successful. If a company is
unable to pay its bills or meet the changing needs of customers, any concerns
about social responsibilities become irrelevant. In other words, a company can
only make a positive contribution to society if it is in good financial health.
On
the other hand, companies should not be run with the sole aim of maximising
profit; they have a wider role to play in society. One social obligation that
owners and managers have is to treat their employees well, rather than
exploiting them. For example, they could pay a “living wage” to ensure that
workers have a good quality of life. I also like the idea that businesses could
use a proportion of their profits to support local charities, environmental
projects or education initiatives. Finally, instead of trying to minimise their
tax payments by using accounting loopholes, I believe that company bosses should
be happy to contribute to society through the tax system.
In
conclusion, I believe that companies should place as much importance on their
social responsibilities as they do on their financial objectives.
No comments:
Post a Comment