Nowadays celebrities are more famous
for their glamour and wealth than for their achievements, and this sets a bad
example to young people.
To what extent do you agree or disagree
with this statement?
It
is true that some celebrities are known for their glamorous lifestyles rather
than for the work they do. While I agree that these celebrities set a bad
example for children, I believe that other famous people act as positive role
models.
On
the one hand, many people do achieve fame without really working for it. They
may have inherited money from parents, married a famous or wealthy person, or
they may have appeared in gossip magazines or on a reality TV programme. A good
example would be Paris Hilton, who is rich and famous for the wrong reasons.
She spends her time attending parties and nightclubs, and her behaviour
promotes the idea that appearance, glamour and media profile are more important
than hard work and good character. The message to young people is that success
can be achieved easily, and that school work is not necessary.
On
the other hand, there are at least as many celebrities whose accomplishments
make them excellent role models for young people. Actors, musicians and sports
stars become famous idols because they have worked hard and applied themselves
to develop real skills and abilities. They demonstrate great effort,
determination and ambition, which is required for someone who wants to be truly
successful in their chosen field. An example is the actor and martial artist
Jackie Chan, who has become world famous through years of practice and hard
work. This kind of self-made celebrity can inspire children to develop their
talents through application and perseverance.
In
conclusion, it seems to me that the influence of celebrities on young people
can be positive as well as negative.
No comments:
Post a Comment